patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Conserving Pantry Brook Farm

Property is the largest undeveloped parcel of land left in Sudbury.

 

(EDITOR'S NOTE: The following edited release was submitted to Sudbury Patch.)

On Dec. 20, 2012, two conservation restrictions were recorded that permanently protect Sudbury’s historic Pantry Brook Farm. At nearly 100 acres, Pantry Brook Farm is the largest undeveloped and unprotected property left in Sudbury, and it possesses remarkable scenic, historical, and ecological features.

This highly visible property, situated on both sides of Concord Road just to the north of Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School, evokes the town’s agrarian history.  On the west side, the farm’s antique homestead is perched above Concord Road, on rolling meadows among rambling colonial stone walls. To the east lie the farm’s extensive agricultural fields, woodlands, and wetlands, connecting to a large network of protected town, state, and federal lands, rendering the farm’s habitat highly valuable for wildlife. 

Sudbury Valley Trustees worked closely with the Wolfe family and the Town of Sudbury to protect Pantry Brook Farm permanently through purchase of the two conservation restrictions (CR’s) - one for each of the two pieces of property that make up the farm.

“At the end of the decade, securing the future of this farm will be regarded as one of our outstanding achievements, said Ron McAdow, executive director of SVT. “Conservationists across the region should be grateful to the Wolfes and to the Town of Sudbury for making it possible to preserve this unique community asset.”

At Sudbury’s May 2012 Annual Town Meeting, voters unanimously approved the appropriation of Community Preservation Act funds to purchase the CR’s. A generous grant from the Sudbury Foundation provided $150,000 toward the purchase price, as well as an additional $25,000 toward a permanent stewardship endowment for the property. Finally, in December 2012, the Town was awarded a $400,000 LAND (Local Areas for Natural Diversity) grant, which will offset some of the Town’s portion of the purchase price.

“Protecting this magnificent farm has been a long time goal of the Town of Sudbury,” said Director of Planning and Community Development Jody Kablack, “and since the adoption of the CPA we have been working with the landowners to ensure its preservation. It is a unique property and its permanent protection will ensure that generations of Sudbury residents will have the opportunity to understand the historical roots of this community.”

Pantry Brook Farm has been in Carole Wolfe’s family since the 1700s. These conservation restrictions allow the Wolfe family to retain ownership of their land, while placing limitations on development, including prohibiting residential development.  Because agriculture is one of the values protected by the CR, additional farm structures are permitted.  The historic farm buildings are also protected, with allowances for restoration and limited renovation. 

The CR will be co-held by the Town and SVT, with SVT responsible for annual monitoring to ensure that the purposes of the CR are being upheld.  Public access is permitted on existing trails on the east side of the property, accessible from the Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School parking lot. The Wolfe family plans extensive, historically-appropriate renovations to the farmhouse, barns and outbuildings, most of which retain original features. Guided tours of the west side of the farm and buildings will be scheduled periodically by the Town and SVT.

Christa Collins, SVT Director of Land Protection recognizes the efforts of all those involved. “Our deep appreciation goes to the Wolfe family. We also recognize the Town of Sudbury and the Sudbury Foundation for making this important conservation project possible as well as many donors who contributed to SVT to support our work on the project and our work going forward as co-holder of the CR.”

"The Sudbury Foundation was pleased to play in role in this effort to conserve what has not only been a high priority open space parcel for the Town but also one of the most beautiful tracks of land in Sudbury,” said Marilyn Martino, the Foundation’s Executive Director. “With this restriction, the land will remain undeveloped forever."

Check svtweb.org to view the outings calendar for upcoming walks on the property.

 

 

Related Topics: Pantry Brook Farm

ron darden

9:09 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

How can the Town of Sudbury and SVT can be "coholders of the Conservation restriction"?

Sudbury paid nearly 8 million and SVT a few hundred thousand, but they are equal co holders of the Conservation Restriction?

How is this legally accounted for? Does SVT own half of the asset? If so, Did Sudbury give away the farm?

Reply
Comment_arrow

siobhan hullinger

9:46 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

Isn't SVT a private non-profit like Trustees of Reservations? I'd like to see the agreement between the Town of Sudbury and SVT.

JJoseph

9:23 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

Ron,
Excellent questions. We will probably never know since there is NO transparency in our local government at all.

Reply

Pat Brown

11:08 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

From the article (where CR is "Conservation Restriction"):
The CR will be co-held by the Town and SVT, with SVT responsible for annual monitoring to ensure that the purposes of the CR are being upheld.

The actual Conservation Restriction language has been accepted by all parties; the question is who enforces it. This agreement makes SVT responsible for monitoring the use of the property and for identifying and pursuing infringements. SVT is a nonprofit with experience in preservation; it is well qualified for this task. It offloads Town Staff, who are by all accounts stretched thin. This is one less expense--one less thing for the Town to do.

Since negotiations are no longer outstanding, I assume that the agreement is a public document available from the Sudbury Office of Planning and Community Development. Has anyone requested and reviewed it? I'd be interested in the provisions also.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christa Collins

2:59 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

Several good questions have been raised here which are easy to address.

First, the CRs (there are two because the farm's two parcels were in different legal ownership) are recorded at the Middlesex South Registry of Deeds and are public documents. I would be happy to provide a copy to anyone who doesn't want to wrestle with the Registry's search function.

Second, Pat is correct - SVT is responsible for annual monitoring, a responsibility that comes with legal obligations and one which we take very seriously. We have two full-time stewardship staff who monitor all the CR's we hold, in addition to caring for our fee-owned reservations.

Third, while the Town and SVT are co-holders, they are co-holders in proportion to the amount they contributed. So, if the CR were ever to be extinguished (and that's a big "if", because we operate under the idea that these are perpetual), the proceeds would be divided proportionally between the Town and SVT. And I should make clear that the Sudbury Foundation provided the $150,000 grant that SVT then put toward the purchase.

Anyone wishing to know more about this transaction or about SVT should feel welcome to contact me.

Christa Collins, SVT Director of Land Protection 978-443-5588 x115

pmotw

2:14 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

If this article does not mention the total cost per the CPA, then I guess it's not important.
If this article does not mention who is paying the real estate tax (if any) on this property than I guess it's not important.
If this article does not mention who is using the land for profit at the expense of Sudbury Taxpayers, I guess it's not important.
If this article does not mention the town is/is not receiving revenue from private business using this publicly funded property, than I guess it's not important either.

Seems all that is important is Mr McAdow and Miss Kablack can receive all the credit for this at the expense of EVERY TAXPAYER!!!!!

I wish I could get a job spending other people’s money.

Reply

Sandra King

4:54 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

It is scandalous that this article does not mention the amount the town and taxpayers paid to give the Wolfe family the ability to "retain ownership of their land...." I thought we (the taxpayers) now owned the land by virtue of having paid in excess of $7 million to the family. The land is beautiful we all agree and we the taxpayers are the ones who should be considered co- owners!

Reply
Comment_arrow

joanne

5:15 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

Well said pmotw & Sandra!

Leave a comment