patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Johnson Farm Controversy Moves to the Conservation Commission

Residents who oppose an affordable housing development planned for South Sudbury continue to voice concern.

 

Dozens of Sudbury residents still hoping to head off the proposed Johnson Farm housing development on Landham Road crowded into the Conservation Commission's Monday night meeting at Town Hall.

The controversial project, which would consist of 56 housing units, has already won preliminary approval from members of the Zoning Board of Appeals, who made it clear they were doing so reluctantly and only because they feared that if they didn't approve a smaller project, developer Robert Moss could appeal to the state and perhaps win approval for a much larger project involving 120 units.

"We have received numerious letters and emails, and we appreciate the interest in the subject," said Commission Chair John Sklenak, mentioning that many of the communications were "emotional" in nature, as opposed to containing factual information that could be used legally as a basis to approve or reject the project. Communities are not permitted to reject 40B projects without specific, verifiable reasons that relate to health and safety.

40B refers to the Massachusetts law passed in 1969 that allows developers more flexibility in bypassing local zoning laws if they set aside at least 25 percent of new housing units for low and moderate income residents at rates deemed affordable. The 56-unit development would include 14 affordable units.

The Commission voted to decline an offer from a neighbor who said that if the decision went against Johnson Farm, he would pay for any off-site mitigation that had also been offered by the developer. The Commission discussed whether accepting either offer could be interpreted as an inappropriate factor in a decision on Johnson Farm, and voted to take both offers off the table before any discussion was made or discussed.

"We are making our own decisions. We are not influenced by any other town officials," said Sklenak. "All we've had is one offer from one Selectman to support whatever decision we want to make, which I would consider impartial."

"Maybe it's me, but I'm just surprised that we're still here this evening discussing whether we are going to build this montrosity on a wetlands," said resident Brian Cain, who argued that more comprehensive environmental studies should be done before the project is considered.

The Commission will begin deliberations on the Johnson Farm matter at its next meeting, which is set for Sept. 10. Members declined a suggestion that they take part in a non-binding straw poll on which direction they are leaning. 

Related Topics: 40B, Affordable Housing, Conservation Commission, ROBERT MOSS, Zoning Board Of Appeals, and johnson farm

pmotw

10:32 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

One would think the CONSERVATION Commission would have major issues with what the developer is planning on doing. If the CONSERVATION Commission agrees with this development, then there are some serious concerns on who is on the CONSERVATION Commission and what it is they are really conserving.

Reply

SkimThreePercent

1:59 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

The CONservation Commission's duties are twofold: to destroy as many wetland resources as possible, and to CON as many folks into believing that they are protecting same.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jon Abraham

7:10 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

I would really appreciate it if you could (a) identify yourself by name, and (b) offer up comments that are constructive. I'd settle for (b) only - it's gotten so bad that I am a little afraid of posting this because I might be attacked for doing so. For me personally, your comments are often very negative in tone, and I don't think that's a good way to have constructive discussion that could lead to improvements.

SueChap

7:26 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Sadly enough, despite the mission statement of this committee, we all know how this will evolve.

The conservation committee reports to town planner, Jody Kablack, who is married to Mass builders association general counsel, Mark Kablack.

No way, No How, the CONservation Committee will go against this permit with any real substance.

Guess who appoints these people? Town planner, Jody Kablack and the Board of Selectmen.

oh, the tangled mass WEBlands we weave.

Reply

Kirsten Vandijk

8:03 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

So it is time that every individual resident who has tangible--TANGIBLE--reasons for not building this Ark to give the ConCom your arguments. Has anyone contacted the Massachusetts Historical Commission to determine if this area is Historically sensitive? Please, do it! I don't have the provenance anymore as I moved from Landham Road.

Reply

Leave a comment