patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Comparing Teacher Compensation

Mary Hawes Mahoney tries to shed some light on the stalled negotiations between Sudbury Public Schools and the Sudbury Education Association.

 

The contract negotiations between the School Committee for the Sudbury Public Schools and the Sudbury Education Association had stalled by the end of the school year.  The reasons are not public because the negotiations are ongoing and therefore not open to anyone but those people actually doing the negotiating.  Only they are privy to the particulars. However, some general information may elucidate readers.

A comparison of current compensation is below (That’s current for 2011 – 2012 unless otherwise noted – as with Newton and Burlington which, respectively, only have 2009 and 2010 online contracts.) The average salaries and Step 10 compensation on the Masters level are shown -- as delineated by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.  All teachers are now required to have a Maters Degree after five years of teaching to retain a license.  And, step ten was chosen because all of the contracts chosen have a minimum of ten steps.It should be noted that “to help the town in its fiscal crisis” three years ago those teachers on steps in Sudbury agreed to forgo their step increases.

Sudbury teachers certainly feel those teachers in the systems shown below earn their salaries. However, Sudbury teachers might just feel that they should be valued as much as comparable systems value their staffs.  After all, the Sudbury Public Schools has been outperforming most of those districts for years on all kinds of state and national evaluations.  One could conclude the teachers had something to do with that.  If Sudbury cannot attract staff of the same quality because the Sudbury contract is not comparable, this level of productive education may be difficult to maintain.

Further, to compensate for the lack of salary, the benefits in the town of Sudbury were once pretty good. However with the Selectmen voted to switch the town’s employees to the GIC, Under the conditions of the new health insurance, according to the information the teachers Association provided, Sudbury teachers pay the highest rates in the state for their insurance plans.

Listed below are some towns to which the Sudbury Public Schools are compared or that are nearby. The average salary for each is displayed on the left.  On the right are the Step 10 Maters level salaries. Some examples in other contracts of extra compensation given to teachers but not shown on the salary scale are displayed below the list. 

 

From the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education:

http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/teachersalaries.aspx and http://educatorcontracts.doemass.org/

 

Average Salary                  Town                           Step 10  Masters level

$92,058                           Sherborn                  76,870  

$88,023                           Dover                           76,870 

$87,269                           Concord Carlisle         74,517  

$84,349                           Dover Sherborn         76,870 

$83,872                           Wayland                  74,416

74,600                             Worcester*(200869,185 – Step 9, no Step 10 available

$81,598                           Concord                  67,202

$81,401                           Brookline                  74,473

$81,070                           Burlington  (2010) 71,617

$81,028                           Carlisle                  74,276

$80,985                           Lincoln Sudbury          68,653 ++

$80,841                           Lowell*       (2008)         72,025

$80,156                           Northboro Soutboro  73,933 

$80,003                           Minuteman*(2011)         68,442

$79,051                           Weston                     69,911 

$77,380                           Cambridge*                  69,291

$77,607                           Lincoln                  68,470  ++

$76,657                           Andover      (2009)         64,070

$76,520                           Boxborough                  68,429

$76,371                           Acton                           70,898

$76,032                           Bedford                  $75,966

$75,807                           Needham                  N/A

$74,413                           Framingham         N/A

$75,454                                 Acton-Boxborough  70,898 ++

 

$73,945                           Hopkinton                     68,011

$73927                           Wellesley                  69,905   ++        

$73,004                           Ashland                  67,600

$72,300                           Belmont                  69,533  

$72,188                           Northboro                  73,572 

$70,826                           Watertown* (2008) 70,266

$69,768                                 Lexington                  70,369  ++

$69,613                            Maynard      (2010)         62,217

$64,843 Sudbury Public Schools 65,749**

* Cities added for extra comparison

 

**Those teachers on Step 10 in Sudbury have been there for two years.

 

 ++ Examples of extra compensation in the contracts but not on the salary schedule that are received by the teachers.  There may be other remuneration in the contracts --this is a sampling. Currently, Sudbury Public School Teachers are offered a $200 matching donation to an approved 403b if they have one.

 

Example1: Acton-Boxborough  At the end of ten years a series of three “Supermax” steps are initiated at Step 10 to be added to the salary scale and are compounded in a way this writer has yet to figure out!  “Supermax Step 1  910   930   960   975   1,005   1,025   1,070                                                                  Supermax Step 2   772   1,171   1,211   1,231   1,270   1,297  1,357                                                Supermax Step 3   971   976   994   1,012   1,028   1,040   1,053”

Example 2:  Lexington:  “Beginning at year 10: $700 Beginning at year 15: $800 Beginning at year 20: $900 Beginning at year 25: $1000 Beginning at year 30: $2500.”  [The town of Lexington also compensated staff for the difference in the health care costs when they went to the GIC.  Lexington personnel report that the staff was given 80% of the difference in the first year and in the next years the percentage decreased. However, the exact language could not be found without a more extensive search.]

Example 3: Wellesley:

“Teachers and nurses who have completed 20 years of service as of the prior June 30 will

receive a longevity stipend or 3% of their base salary, whichever is less for the following years.. FY 12                    $2,637”

Example 4: Lincoln:

“The teachers shall receive as compensation the following remuneration for service in the Lincoln School System:

 

(a)     Completion of ten (10) years of service and every year thereafter through the fifteenth (15th) year of serve:  $1,000

(b)     Completion of fifteen (15) years of service and every year thereafter through the twentieth (20th) year of service: $1,500

(c)     Completion of twenty (20) years of service and every year thereafter through the twenty–fifth (25th) year of service: $2,000

(d)     Completion of twenty-five (25) years of service and every year thereafter: $2,500

 

Example 5: Weston:

Longevity

Beginning at year 15: $500; Beginning at year 20: $600; Beginning at year 25: $700”

INSURANCE AND ANNUITY PLANS

Section 1. Eligible teachers may at their request participate in a Tax-Sheltered Annuity Plan.

Section 2. The School Committee will pay:

A.    50% of a two thousand dollar group term life insurance policy;

B.    50% of the indemnity individual or family health care insurance coverage, whichever applies in the particular case;

C.    80% on the non-indemnity individual or family health care insurance coverage, whichever applies in the particular case;

The above pertains to all plans presently in effect and such plans as may be mutually agreed upon.”

 

Example 6:  Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School

“L-S Service Stipend

(b)

In recognition of continuing excellence in teaching and service to the school, a stipend of $500 for each five years of service at Lincoln-Sudbury as defined in Article 5.13 will be paid annually to faculty members who have been employed by Lincoln-Sudbury for more than five years.

Payment of this stipend shall be made in accordance with Section 5.9 “

 

“L-S Master Teacher Stipend

In recognition of continuing excellence in teaching, professional development and service to the school, a Master Teacher Stipend will be paid annually to faculty members who meet each of the following criteria. A Master Teacher:

1. has ten or more years of service at Lincoln-Sudbury as defined in Section 5.13 and is on the Masters+30 Level or beyond,

OR has twenty or more years of service at Lincoln-Sudbury as defined in Section5.13 and is on the Masters+15 Level

2. receives no step increase

For eligibility, a Master Teacher must have a current evaluation of Category 1. The Master Teacher Stipend shall be as follows:

Master Teacher Stipend

09-10 10-11 11-12

$2500         $2500          $2500”

Mary Hawes Mahoney

Related Topics: Sudbury Education Association, Sudbury Public Schools, and Teacher Salaries

Miles Finch

1:10 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012

Bob, I must say I am saddened by your true lack of sympathy for our teachers. For someone who is always sticking his nose into things against the establishment (more often than not to the detriment of your supporters and your intent) you really should reconsider being so callous. Mrs Mahoney is not suggesting we need an override at this juncture, rather she is asking that our school committee and school administration be more focused on the classroom and the impact good teachers have as opposed to crappy ones and compensate them accordingly. You made a point recently that for every teacher job opening we have 100 applicants something which is patently untrue. Furthermore, the teachers and administration are not one in the same and thus throwing your hands up in this manner will do nothing but drive those voters sitting on the fence against the teachers...not a smart move.

Reply

SkimThreePercent

4:41 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012

A K12 system is required moving forward.

Although not anticipated, it is also now clear that Sudbury made a terrible mistake in hiring the Superintendent. But again, the problem is systemic. With K12 they applicant pool would have been much richer and things would be much further along.

Reply

Enuff

6:48 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012

Everyone else in the Commonwealth of MA has figured out that K-12 makes sense, but unfortunately, we keep electing people that think we are supposedly "special" and can't do it that way. Keep electing the same folks you will continue to get the same results. Shame on Sudbury. We can do better.

Reply

mary margaret morrissey

1:13 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Apparently, I am not alone in seeing the large number of job openings in the SPS. Perhaps compensation may be one reason. That research shows me that the money for SPS is not going to the teachers or into the classrooms. It seems to be going to an overloaded administration. Also, to a superintendent who thinks having Sudbury taxpayers buy her expensive new office furniture and pay to have her office painted twice by professional painters and not the usual school custodial people is more important than what is in the classroom. Like the lack of computers unless the parents run fundraisers. Like new books. I think the students currently use more teacher-purchased material than school purchased. What a deal! Oops, that isn't working so well since our teachers seem be trying to find better paying places to work.

Reply

John McMahon

4:30 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Is there any information on the costs of benefits, sick days, health insurance, etc.. In comparison to other communities?

Reply
Comment_arrow

siobhan hullinger

2:44 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

My husband has done the comparisons - line by line - for years, however, no one shows up for Town Meeting anymore to move funds to SPS. It is clear that the SPS committee, LS committee, FinCom and two of the BoS members, don't care about the SPS teachers. How aweful to be a teacher in this system and see administration grow, administrative salaries grow and continuously being pushed to make more and more concessions.
People move here for the schools - ie - the success of the teachers, not because we have an abundant administration. I feel for them and only hope that the voters wake up and see what apathy is doing to our teachers, town and property values.

John McMahon

4:39 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Or, how about comparing what it costs Sudbury taxpayer per student, all costs included ie buildings, bonds, salary, benefits, custodial etc... Then compare with other communities.

Reply

Mike Hullinger

8:21 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

SPS operating costs per student ranks near the bottom compared to peer towns and K-8 (or k-6) school systems state wide. The problem is how the procedures this town uses for annual budgeting. It starts with a calculation of how much money is available in total town wide based on Prop 2.5% levy limits plus new growth plus anticipated state aid. If that results in a town wide spending increase of 4%, each of the 3 seperate legal entities are given 4% to work with, whether they need it or not. We then use a "master limiting motion" to first approve total town wide spending. We do not deal with the 3 seperate legal entity budgets seperately. 3 year ago at Town meeting, I introduced an amendment to move money from another legal entity to SPS. I and eveyone at Town Meeting was informed by the then head of FinCom about "how we do things" in this town, and that a group called the "budget working group" decided how much money SPS, the Town, and LS would get. this prompted an immediate question about this group meeting in violation of open meeitng laws and the filing of a complaint. This practice has since stopped. However, SPS will continue to suffere because of the "Maste Limiting Motion" procedure. SPS teachers have previously taken freezes in Cola's or steps, and moved their health care to GIC with additional costs shifted to them. Stop the master limiting motion procedure and we can get appropriate funding for SPS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SkimThreePercent

9:14 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012

No Mike, you're wrong. The problem is the K8 configuration.

With K12 the limiting master limiting motion procedure becomes moot as the three competing cost centers become two.

Another problem is as you mention, the Teachers Union at SPS has done a poor job of negotiating their contracts. They have allowed Lincoln to paint the regional high school as a special kind of place worthy of over funding to remain special where a volleyball coach active in the union takes in more than the Loring School Principal.

We also need a representative TM, a new Moderator and changes to his FinCom club.

BTW, the Town shouldn't be a run as a "club".

Comment_arrow

siobhan hullinger

2:39 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Yes a k-12 would make sense but I think there is a better chance of success in unbundling the cost centers. Of course, it WOULD mean that people would have to go out and vote out the old guard on the BoS since I believe they are the ones who bundled them previously. When I first moved here over 20 years ago, the centers were not bundled.
SPS teachers have a better chance to see their contract concessions stay with them and get more if they would vote as a block against the old guard.

SueChap

9:02 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

SPS teacher compensation comparison requires a review of the additional headcount added in the years the teachers opted to accept lower or no salary adjustments. One has to consider the non-classroom support or the non teacher certified support to fairly consider compensation.

Sudbury will never have transparency shed on this topic until a K-12 system is introduced. When they do this, we should follow similar districts who pay their teachers on the same scale (Dover Sherborn as an example).

It seems with the popularity of Dr. Wilson, we have an opportunity to ask her and her mercedes to depart our district, and consolidate with LS. We will then be able to address redundent finance, accounting, payroll, human resources, maintenance, technology, etc. departments. We should also address those employees having students educated in our districts. We have a maintenance person who helps out with a sport, stipend eligible, but as a result, SPS is host to his 5 or 6 children. This contradicts what we are told in public in that only TEACHERS are eligible to have their students educated here.

so many problems, so many years. Some day light will be shed and we can move forward recognizing our teachers as they so deserve.

Reply

Christine Hogan

9:37 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

SueChap: when you say that in public only TEACHERS are eligible to have their students educated here, that includes administrators' children, correct? I am only asking because I believe this is the case and want to confirm.

Reply

John McMahon

10:59 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Blah blah blah! All costs with no segmentation or excluding this or that cannot be that difficult to compute. All costs including bonding costs, salaries, benefits, building maintenance, operating budgets, etc divided by the number of students in k thru 12. Then compare to other communities.

Can anyone provide? It can't be too difficult unless there is a reluctance to shed light!

Reply

SueChap

9:50 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012

John, if we look over the blah, blah, blah -- good idea. Unfortunately application of cost allocation would require this be consolidated at a very high level, which may result in integrity being lost.

Reply

Edward Stark

7:55 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Thanks for the statistics Ms. Mahoney they are very eye opening. That being said I am trying to come to grips with the solution. After all you can't take blood from a stone. There are 2 ways to rectify the problem you have presented. 1. We can elect leaders who will look for solutions such as consolidating our 2 redundant school administrations or 2. pass an override. Let's face reality; an override just isn't going to happen. On one hand we have a school committee that can't get a budget under control and a superintendent who just received a 200 signature vote of no confidence. On another we have a town manager who also cannot get her budget under control but instead moves money around from fund to fund to cover her mistakes. The only positive is that Ryan and Collins are gone who continually gave away the farm to LS teachers while our SPS teachers made sacrifices. Let's see if we do any better this year.

Ms Mahoney I suggest you repost this letter around election time in March. Seeing that an override seems unlikely, the only way you will ever get your "fair share" is through changes in town leadership. I personally am sick and tired of voting yes for overrides and will begin to do so again when people are in place who know how to develop and stick to (and not manipulate) a budget.

Reply

Leave a comment