In time for last Friday's Jan. 18bill filing deadline in the State House, state Sen. Mike Barrett, D-Lexington, has embraced legislative proposals to protect women’s health, ban tobacco sales in pharmacies and other places where health professionals work, and require manufacturers of computer electronics to be responsible for the disposal, recycling and reuse of old equipment.
“People in the district are contacting me with a lot of ideas,” Barrett, who represents the Third Middlesex District, said in a statement released Friday, Jan. 18, “And these will be reflected in the comprehensive list of legislative sponsorships and co-sponsorships we release at the end of the month. Today’s survey of three items reflects the diversity of district thinking.”
One of the bills Barrett is supporting would repeal or amend outdated laws that remain on the books and restrict women’s choices around family planning. One outmoded statute outlaws birth control for unmarried couples while another compels women to have abortions in hospitals only. Barrett is pro-choice and has been involved in women’s issues for four decades.
At the suggestion of a Chelmsford constituent, Barrett is also sponsoring a bill to prevent pharmacies and other retail establishments with specialized health functions from selling cigarettes and other tobacco products.
“If a store is supposed to be promoting public health,” Barrett says, “it shouldn’t at the same time promote and sell nicotine.”
As an environmental matter, Barrett is supporting legislation to require manufacturers of computers, TVs, cell phones and other electronics to be responsible for their collection, disposal, recycling and reuse. At the same time, the bill provides incentives to electronic manufacturers to produce less-toxic products. Barrett is not alone in taking this approach:182 cities and towns in Massachusetts have passed nonbinding resolutions to this effect.
Meanwhile, Barrett is hearing from constituents on a huge variety of topics. Since being sworn in earlier this month, he’s received 28 emails on the single issue of so-called “breed neutral” laws – animal control laws that permit individual dogs to be found to be dangerous, but which do not extend “dangerous dog” designations to entire breeds.
Anna Bucciarelli
4:16 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Who ever said a pharmacy is supposed to promote public health? First I've heard of it. I think, in truth, they are a business, they sell, and also happen to have a license to dispense Rx's ... if we talk about banning their sale of nicotine, how about banning their sale of junk food, candy bars, soft drinks, and on and on? There are far more important issues to address to my way of thinking. This is just plain stupid! And another instance of gov. interference in personal choices and lives.
Andrew Sylvia
6:05 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Hey Anna,
I want to apologize if I sounded rude on the top articles of the week piece on Monday. To be honest, I don't actually know how that program works, they operate it out of HQ with technical jargon way over my head that counts everybody who comes to the site.
NWBL
10:51 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
I think you make a very good point and Barrett will be in for quite a fight from the pharmacies in the district if he goes forward with this.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
5:17 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Oh Lord, here we go. Mike Barrett is ready for legislative action. A moonbat's moonbat gears up to impress his constituents.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Aron Levy
1:32 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Aww, are you sad no Teahadist won any Middlesex seat? Why don't you run for public office, since you obviously know EVERYTHING!
Anna Bucciarelli
6:30 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Andrew ... no apology necessary, especially since I never saw any "rude" response from you. Was just a curiosity on my part and hardly of great importance. Thanks for this explanation, tho, much appreciated.
Isabella Jancourtz
3:43 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Mike Barrett listens to constituent ideas, so let him know if you have something in mind that would be good for our Commonwealth. You may find your idea being debated on the floor of the state senate and eventually enacted into law.
If you have a problem, Mike and his staff respond to constituent needs. We are very luck to have him as our new state senator.
Happy MLK Day and Happy Inauguration Day to all.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
4:13 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
I have a dream... that Mike Barrett will not add needless regulations to further hinder the Massachusetts business environment... that he will resist the tax and spend policies he has become used to... that by the end of his term, he will have done minimum legislative damage... I have a dream.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Aron Levy
4:18 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
And I have a dream that the Anti-Pope above me will one day reveal his true identity and get a life. He comments on thirty different Patches regularly. And during business hours as well. Something tells me he can't be bothered with real work...
Andrew Sylvia
9:12 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013
Anti-pope?
Aron Levy
11:01 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Andrew, it's a reference to the time when there used to be two Popes, one in Rome, the other in Avignon. I just called him the Anti-Pope, not because he was a Pontiff set up at the behest of the Bourbon dynasty, but because he's about as unholy a 'holy man' can be. He's got about as much compassion as a ravenous tiger approaching a rabbit den.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
5:30 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Nope... not the Anti-pope. Just an antidote for relentless, thoughtless liberal drivel. And if picked up on other Patch sites - all the better.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Andrew Sylvia
7:42 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Yeah, that's not what I meant. Not sure what the connection is to Reverend and what you just mentioned other than its an insult.
In any case, knock it off please. Talk to the subject, not each other.
Aron Levy
5:44 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Picked up? Hardly. You post there. And considering you are seeming more and more like a sock puppet of other prominent users in the area, I think that tells me all I need to know. Go back to the seminary, Deacon. They missed the part about 'loving thy enemies.'
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
5:56 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Aron,
I've spoken to the topic at hand - Barrett's legislative priorities. Would you care to stoop and opine?
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Aron Levy
6:11 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Deacon, what you did was wish that a progressive Democrat suddenly became a teahadist.
While I'm not a big fan of banning the sale of tobacco in pharmacies, two factors kept me from commenting on that:
1. I buy my tobacco (cigars and pipe tobacco) at dedicated tobacconists, so the ban wouldn't effect me, and
2. There's no way the ban would pass, so it's a moot point anyway.
Now why don't you head back to southen France and leave us decent Americans alone?
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
6:37 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Aron,
Not sure what to make of your post, especially the closing.
I've read some of your comments elsewhere, and I cannot work any magic. Let us disengage.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Kelly
12:15 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Preach on Reverend
Tyler Jozefowicz
6:43 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Mike Barrett is a fine man and will make a great State Senator. Comes from an extensive business background. Now that should impress the anti-liberals out there. That is why he won and his Republican foe lost big time. The people united will never be defeated, or as the Tea Leaves say: "We the People".
Aron Levy
12:47 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
It looks like my Malden stalker is back. I thought I had lost him.
Matt Hanson
2:06 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Requiring manufacturers of computer electronics, as well as other devices containing hazardous materials, to be responsible for the disposal, recycling and reuse of old equipment currently works well in other countries. I am not sure if any other states are currently requiring this. Does anyone know? If Massachusetts is one of the first, the companies here will probably invest in R&D to find the best way to do this, patent their findings, and hopefully make great profits as other states require this type of recycling in the future. That is exactly what happened to many Massachusetts based companies when regulations were passed to reduce the use of hazardous chemicals in the manufacturing process. It ended up being much cheaper than originally thought, companies were able to patent their findings and manufacture using a tiny fraction of the hazardous materials once used. Not to mention the positive effect this would have on our environment. I am sure the companies touched by this legislation will share their issues and concerns with Senator Barrett and the rest of the legislators in Boston.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
5:05 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
This is exactly the kind of naive thinking that results in new anti-business legislation. It seems so green and so wonderful, who could be against such an idea
But at ultimately implemented, it frequently turns into a monster. Then a CEO asks him or herself, "Shall I build a new plant in Massachusetts, where I have to comply with this expensive recycling requirement, or shall I go to New Hampshire, or North Carolina?" You know the outcome.
The EPA is doing enough of this stuff nationally without additional state involvement. Look at what this sort of thinking is doing the California. There is a massive business exodus underway.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
siobhan hullinger
5:26 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Yes - sort of like those new light bulbs everyone is supposed to use. Wonder if we'll have the mercury issue again in our landfills since that's what's in them. Hope y'all are leaving the room when one breaks.... So is "green" really that "green"?
Tina
2:36 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
While I applaud Senator Barrett's pro-choice stance, I oppose his bill to ban tobacco sales in pharmacies. This will hurt their business, because when people go to CVS or Walgreen's, for example, to buy cigarettes, they usually end up spending more money on other sundries like makeup, magazines, shampoo, after-shave, Easter baskets and Kleenex. In this economy, we should not do anything to detract from their business.
Aron Levy
3:39 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Well said, Tina.
Kelly
3:12 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Don't flatter yourself
Aron Levy
3:32 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Then stop creating a new sock puppet and posting on nearly every article on which I comment. The moderators know about you. Everyone knows about you. It's time for you to grow up.
Aron Levy
5:08 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Yeah, because the hell with this planet! If we ruin it, we'll just find another one, right Deacon?
Or are you waiting for Second Coming to rapture you away?
And anyway, you're a 'priest.' What do you know of business?
Aron Levy
5:29 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
LEDs, Siobhan, LEDs.
siobhan hullinger
5:47 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
@ Aron Levy - perhaps but read on... http://www.gizmag.com/led-bulbs-found-to-contain-toxic-metals/17876/
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
12:54 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Siobhan,
No there is only a trace of mercury, or none at all. That is why the new 'green' compact fluorescents work so poorly... they take much longer to come up to full light output, do not start in cold weather, and are frequently short lived. But there's no mercury.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
5:50 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Siobhan,
No there is only a trace of mercury, or none at all. That is why the new 'green' compact fluorescents work so poorly... they take much longer to come up to full light output, do not start in cold weather, and are frequently short lived. But there's no mercury.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Aron Levy
5:53 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Siobhan don't get me wrong, as a reader, I despise CFLs with a burning passion. I will keep my incandescents as long as they are available.
And when I can afford it, I upgrade to LED. As you know, they last for what is effectively an eternity. And by the time they burn out, I'm sure they will have discovered a proper disposal method.
I just can't stand folks like the 'Anti-Pope' who would put profits over their children's futures. I had once read somewhere that Christianity was a religion of compassion. But I guess I may have been mistaken.
Anna Bucciarelli
6:10 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Watch out, guys ... Barrett will soon not allow pharmacies to sell light bulbs either !!!
ME? I hate those curley bulbs and i'm with you Aron, I'll use the innies as long as I can but, take note, I could not find hundred-watt bulbs anywhere last week ... do you know if LED's come in high wattage?
Tina
10:07 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
For a couple of years, I've been stockpiling incandescent bulbs, especially the 100-watters, as they will be the first to be phased out. Many of my favorite lamps will not accommodate CFLs, because the metal shade holders fit directly on the light bulb.
Frosty the Snowman
5:38 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Tina hate to crush your great plan, but they make the CFL light bulbs with a plastic bulb on the shape of a standard bulb for that very reason. Instead of hoarding light bulbs you should have patented that idea years ago....
Tina
4:13 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Frosty, where can I find those CFLs in the shape of a standard incandescent bulb? I'd like to try them!
Anna Bucciarelli
5:26 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Tina ... wanna sell me a few? (joke)
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
7:17 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
How many are aware that the dreaded substance dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO) is used in the manufacture of CFLs and LEDs?
http://www.dhmo.org/
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Joseph G. Paquette
9:10 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
In a short period of time, i have found State Sen. Mike Barrett has quickly responded to my concerns with quick dispatch and intelligent respect and concern for my point of view which he has not always shared but has tried to see from my point of reaching out to him for resolve. What more do you want from a public servant?
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
9:22 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Duh... lots more.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Joseph G. Paquette
9:48 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Those That Can, Do!
Those That Can't, Teach!
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III, respectfully have you considered in your work and in your outlook as to the Wonders of What The Supreme Being or Supreme Beings Together Created Here on this very small planet called: Terra?
Andrew Sylvia
11:04 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Comments have been deleted due to violations of the Terms of Use. Can't say I didn't warn you.
Jean Whiting
11:58 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
I just tuned in and watched this exchange. "Anti-Pope"? Anti-business? Thank you, Andrew, for stopping this exchange. What took you so long?
Anna Bucciarelli
5:58 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I get a kick out of the banter ... don't always agree, don't always like what I read, but read on I do. Interesting how folks' minds work.
Andrew Sylvia
10:07 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I'd like to believe that two grown adults can act in a civil manner without me having to come in and babysit every five minutes, so I was trying to show some leeway due to the fact that political topics can get heated, despite the fact that everyone I run into in Westford continually tells me they want more moderation and nobody in Chelmsford tells me they want less.
Aron Levy
12:23 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Well pardon me for expressing my tiring of the Deacon's constant blathering. The only suggestions he ever makes are to turn this country hard right.
I've got more pressing concerns anyway. Still waiting for him to throw his preacher's hat in the ring.
Anna Bucciarelli
5:59 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Question, Aron ... is he REALLY a preacher?
Andrew Sylvia
10:02 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Aron. Final warning.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
8:51 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Bless you, my sister. Bless you. We have much to be thankful for here in the Commonwealth. The dominant rule of moonbat Democrats is not one of them.
Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III
Andrew Sylvia
10:09 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Reverend. Warning you too. You want to generalize, that's fine. No mentioning other users.
Anna Bucciarelli
6:00 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Tina ... I have seen them right on the supermarket shelves, at K-Mart, Walmart, Target and the big box stores ... they look similar to incandescents but have the curley inside. I can't say they are abundant but they can be found. I haven't tried them yet but I really don't like the light that comes from the curleys and when I was at Lowes this week for another reason, I saw that they still had 100 watters ... the fellow in that dept. said they had an inventory of them and are allowed to sell them till gone, then it is definitely the curleys.
paul surette
5:26 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013
When I was younger, and into my photography, I liked the subtlety of dimly lit places. It offered a flare for the dramatic. Nowadays, I like light, as in bright lights. I've stalked up on 100-watters myself. I agree, Annie, as the 'curlies' don't perform as well. And talk about heating up? I could read War & Peace in the time it takes to get to full wattage. Speaking of dimly-lit bulbs, when was the last time anyone saw a 'bright' light on Beacon Hill? Sylvania must be making a fortune on Beacon Hill! By the way, Annie, where have you been? You've missed some good fodder on the Malden page. There have been mobs carrying pitchforks and torches. But take solace when I tell you I slipped out the back of the windmill. :>)
Anna Bucciarelli
7:01 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013
Paul ... you talkin' to me? I am called "Annie" by my family and almost all who know me and as you have changed your method in photography, I felt lately I needed to "grow up" and use the name on my birth certificate, given me by 2 loving parents who were VERY surprised to be lucky enough to have me after 5 others! However, I do favor and like being called Annie, it's the real me and always has been ... my mama called me "Naninella", which in Italian means "Little Annie" and so did my sweet ol' man. To answer your ? re: the goings on in Malden, fact is I don't get the Patch from Malden and wish I did ... Malden really sounds to me so much like the Bronx I grew up in, a little bit of home in my mind. I'll have to see about subscribing to it, plus the Stoneham one ... they seem to offer more in the way of controversial issues most of the time and, as you well know, I love to stir things up!>:)