.

Christine Hogan for SPS School Committee

I'm supporting Christine Hogan because I feel a growing disconnect between my level of concern over slipping school rankings, and the SPS’ level of focus on it.

Where it all started.
Where it all started.

The first thing that struck us about Sudbury was the stone walls. Other towns had them, but here it was the rule and not the exception. It signaled a foundation we wanted to build our family on.

We found a home we loved, and did our homework. The schools stood out. It was 2006, and the quality of the schools was what brought our family to Sudbury.

2010 was the last year of all five SPS schools rated “Level 1.” In 2011, Curtis became a Level 2 school based on its MCAS scores. In 2012, Loring joined Curtis at Level 2. Last year Noyes and Nixon joined them.

I would expect the SPS to be laser-focused on this decline, if only to get to the bottom of it. I would certainly expect them to acknowledge the problem, and to take action.

At the School Committee meeting in September, Superintendent Wilson presented these scores with comments emphasizing that our student scores remained “above average.” No note was made of the drop in Math scores for grades 5, 6, and 8, nor of the drop in the Language Arts scores overall. Committee member Scott Nassa took her to task, highlighting drops in statewide rankings that included a fall in the Nixon 3rd grade math score from 105 to 487 among the Commonwealth’s 955 schools. Next year, we’ll have a Nixon third grader.

In February, the School Committee said Sudbury had never been a Level 1 District. In the current election, one sitting candidate asked that we not “over emphasize MCAS.” The other grudgingly acknowledged a problem, only to attribute it to the end of budget over-rides a few years back. Really? So the problem is we’re not spending enough, with residential tax rates near Massachusett’s 90th percentile?

I don’t think our schools are failing us, and I know there are good people at every level of SPS. I feel a growing disconnect between my level of concern over all this, though, and the SPS’ level of focus on it. I’d like to see another parent on that committee, someone who feels as I do that for all that’s going right, something is going wrong, and we need to do something about it.

Christine Hogan is that parent, and that candidate. She’s a leader in Sudbury, and a fiscal grown-up running a family business. She’s been a resident for fourteen years, raising five great kids here with her husband Paul. When Christine’s youngest graduates in the L-S Class of 2027, she’ll have spent 25 consecutive years in the Sudbury schools. She’s a tireless volunteer for our schools, especially in the music programs for both SPS and L-S. If you caught The Little Mermaid Jr. this month, you saw Christine right up front playing piano.

Christine Hogan is who we need on that committee, to make sure the perspective of parents is driving decisions, and the voice of parents is heard. Please join me in supporting her on March 31. 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

siobhan hullinger March 21, 2014 at 07:07 AM
Great letter, Mike.
Prometheus March 21, 2014 at 07:58 AM
It is about time.
pmotw March 21, 2014 at 10:26 AM
Hogan has my vote!
Concerned Sudbury Parent March 21, 2014 at 07:08 PM
Christine has my vote too! Hopefully Dr. Robison's extremely arrogant and condescending attitude will finally catch up with him. Say goodnight Rich.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »