Discussion Continues on Finance Committee Appointment Concerns

A pair of residents addressed selectmen during the public comments portion of Tuesday's meeting.

Robert Stein addresses the Board of Selectmen during Tuesday's meeting. (Matt Schooley Photo)
Robert Stein addresses the Board of Selectmen during Tuesday's meeting. (Matt Schooley Photo)

The recent Finance Committee appointments that have some residents concerned about the process were the topic of discussion on Tuesday night. A pair of residents spoke to the Board of Selectmen during the public comments portion of the agenda.

Resident Bryan Semple addressed the board on Tuesday, as did Robert Stein, who was one of two Finance Committee members replaced by Town Moderator Myron Fox. Both Semple and Stein said they believe the Finance Committee changes were made as retaliation for the replaced members’ stances on financial issues.

While speaking to selectmen, Semple asked board members what kind of Finance Committee the town wants to have – one that is a “financial watchdog group” or one that is “just a mild rubber stamp of the policies that are put into place by the various town bodies, providing insufficient advocacy for taxpayers, providing little credibility to the legislature and ultimately harming all our efforts to create a better town.”

Though newly selected Board of Selectmen chairman Chuck Woodard reiterated that the bylaws are clear that selectmen have no authority over the Town Moderator’s appointments or the Finance Committee, Semple had a proposal.

“The BOS should vote on a non-binding resolution stating ‘We the members of the Board of Selectmen request the newest members of FINCOM resign and reapply along with all other interested members of the town, for consideration by FINCOM, through an open, public interview and appointment process,” Semple said. “It is easy, and restores a level of transparency to the committee, and no one should object to transparency for such an important committee.”

Stein, meanwhile, was not before the board to specifically address the new additions to the Finance Committee. Instead, he accused the Town Manager and Town Counsel of “an attempt to manipulate the town warrant,” saying “at least, it is an overstepping of the Town Manager’s authority.”

The former FINCOM member’s accusations stem from a March 17 vote at the Finance Committee meeting regarding Article 16 and Article 19 of Annual Town Meeting.

FINCOM voted against both financial articles in advance of Town Meeting, something that Stein said left many town employees and other officials upset with how the Finance Committee voted.

Two days after the vote Stein received an email from the Town Manager, stating that the votes for those two articles were invalid because a quorum was not present.

Stein said that opinion came without research from Town Counsel. According to Stein, when asked to do more research of case law, Town Counsel issued a new opinion and said the votes were indeed valid.

“Had FINCOM members not pursued their own research of case law, the town warrant would have been printed with ‘report at town meeting’ since the deadline was the following Tuesday for the warrant,” Stein said. “This potential manipulation of the town’s legal document, the town warrant, is a serious issue.”

After hearing from both Stein and Semple, the Board of Selectmen discussed the Finance Committee issue briefly, before deciding it would be best to put the topic on the agenda for its next meeting.

Concerned Sudbury Parent May 22, 2014 at 10:42 AM
john baranowsky May 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM
It's interesting to see how suddenly Chauls comes out of the closet strong after what happened the other night. So is Mr. Chauls the inspirational force behind the majority BOS policy platform. The puzzle pieces are coming together nicely.
JJoseph May 22, 2014 at 11:25 AM
Mr. Chauls, If you can in good conscience condone the behavior of Chuck Woodard and Len Simon the other night then best of luck to you. Their behavior was a disgrace, disrespectful and an embarrassment for the Town of Sudbury. Who is this "small group" you refer to? The Town of Sudbury needs much better management by much better managers.
Bryan Semple May 22, 2014 at 05:51 PM
Don - as I am the subject of your comments, I will reply. We can't have a discussion about the issues if you just try to brush off people and issues by labeling them tea party members. What happened on FINCOM is not right. I am far from a tea party member and your comments, as a member of the democratic town committee, remind me how distasteful both parties get at their extremes. Speak to the issues. There is no vast right wing conspiracy in town just like the vast liberal media isn't hiding obama's birth certificate story.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »